Reference · Model scope
Claims
ENI6MA’s strongest Technology statements are model-scoped: they hold under named axioms and the reference architecture (including burn-before-validate). This page lists the affirmative claim classes those pages point to.
~4 min overview · ~2 min formalContinue: Axioms
Strong words · named assumptions
Read the affirmative claims column first: empty-channel mutual information under named axioms, replay dying at burn, and capture ≠ knowledge. Assumptions and reference architecture sit beside the claims so absolute words stay scoped. Takeaway: Claims list what we affirm under the model.
How to read absolute language
When we say “impossible” or “zero,” we mean under a named model and deployment pattern. Absolute mechanism claims point at axioms P1–P4 and the reference architecture. Formal symbols such as I and O live in the notation table.
Affirmative claim classes
Summary classes, not a substitute for Math or Axioms pages.
| Claim class | Example | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Empty channel MI | I of X semicolon O given C equals 0 | Axioms + construction assumptions |
| Replay denial | Probability of accepting a replay equals 0 | Burn-before-validate architecture |
| Capture ≠ compromise | I effective equals 0 | Observer model |
| One-shot authority | Stolen transcript ≠ capability | Freshness + burn |
Where to deepen
- Axioms, theorems, and bounds: load-bearing assumptions P1–P4 behind empty-channel claims.
- Security (reference architecture): gate order, burn-before-validate, and shipping coexistence.
- Research papers: public Technology corpus for Shannon framing and Rosario–Wang formalism.
- Compare security systems: paradigm cells for information-theoretic authorization versus computational possession-auth.
- Intellectual property: rights notice only; patent filings are legal instruments, not website tutorials.